photo courtesy of imagerymajestic at

When it comes to vaccinations, there are guidelines that suggest who should, and who should not get vaccinated. This includes the flu vaccine as well as childhood vaccination. 

 In 1958, after nine cases of eczema vaccinatum (a complication of the small pox vaccine) appeared, including two fatalities, the American Academy of Pediatrics created a guideline saying:
      1) No child with atopic eczema or other skin disorder should be vaccinated.
      2) No child should be vaccinated if any member of his family has eczema or skin disorder.
      3) Parents of children with eczema should be notified at the onset of the disease, of the danger from vaccination contact.
      4) If a sibling of a child with atopic eczema is vaccinated, he must be completely separated from that child with eczema for at least 21 days.
      5) Forms used by state and local health departments for parents’ consent to vaccinate should include an appropriate warning of these contraindications.
      6) Eczema vaccinatum should be a reportable disease.
       7) Patients recently vaccinated must be excluded from pediatric wards containing patients with atopic eczema, other diseases of the skin, burns or healing surgical incisions.
       8) Vaccination may be recommended at 2 months of age, especially for babies from strongly allergic families.
{We are taking a leap of faith and have added a donate button instead of using advertisers. Advertisements have been removed from this page to make your reading uninterrupted. If you learn something here, please donate so we can keep offering these posts. This post contains affiliate links, which sometimes pay for this site}.
In 2012 Clinical Infectious Diseases, a publication of Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America says, “Despite careful screening to exclude persons at risk of adverse reactions, the past decade has seen a number of instances in which a vaccinee, or a household contact, has developed a disseminated vaccinia virus infection.” (2012;54(6):832–40).
They go on to say, “Current guidelines therefore exclude anyone who has been diagnosed with eczema or has a household contact with the condition.” 
For these people hyperplastic keratinocytes which exists in regenerating skin can contain high levels of nucleotides and other anabolic substrates. When this situation is present, the environment is ripe and ready for spreading viral infections which, when introduced through the vaccine, take advantage of the “fertile soil” present, which is the compromised person themselves. 
CIF further adds, “Eczema is not the only dermatologic condition that places a vaccinee at increased risk of vaccinia virus spreading outside the inoculation site. The medical literature from the era of universal vaccination contains many reports of the accidental spread of infection to areas of damaged skin in persons with a variety of diseases and injuries, ranging from acne to varicella. When the area of damaged skin was extensive, such infection could be severe or even fatal. Current vaccination policy therefore calls for deferral of persons with transient dermatologic diseases or injuries until the skin lesions have healed.”
The Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Smallpox by the Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine says, “Persons with other acute, chronic or exfoliative conditions (e.g., burns, impetigo, varicella zoster, herpes, severe acne or psoriasis) are at higher risk for inadvertent inoculation and should not be vaccinated until the condition resolves.”
They go on to say, “The literature also supports that persons with Darier’s disease can develop eczema vaccinatum and therefore should not be vaccinated.”
Those with autoimmunity issues are also covered, “Vaccinia vaccine should not be administered to persons with HIV infection or AIDS.”

Health care professionals are provided specific guidelines which should be discussed with the patient. “Before vaccination, potential vaccinees should be educated about the risk of severe vaccinial complications among persons with HIV infection or other immunosuppressive conditions; persons who think they may have one of these conditions should not be vaccinated.” (p. 43).

This information is clearly printed on the package insert for the vaccination, “These risks, including risks of severe disability and/or death, are increased in vaccinees with: Cardiac disease. Eye disease treated with topical steroids. Congenital or acquired immune deficiency disorders. History or presence of eczema and other skin conditions. Infants < 12 months of age. Pregnancy ACAM2000 is a live vaccinia virus that can be transmitted to persons who have close contact with the vaccinee and the risks in contacts are the same as those stated for vaccinees.” For other package insert advisements click here.
 There are many flu vaccine inserts as there are many flu vaccines. The consistency in them remains the same for those with egg allergy saying the flu vaccine is “contraindicated” which the National Institute of Health describes as, “A specific situation in which a drug, procedure, or surgery should not be used because it may be harmful to the person.”
This flu vaccine insert says it like this, “Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the vaccine including egg protein, or to a previous dose of any influenza vaccine.”
This one says it like this, “Severe allergic reaction to any component of the vaccine, including egg protein, or after previous dose of any influenza vaccine.”
This one, as well as most others, says much of the same, “History of severe allergic reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the vaccine, including egg protein, or following a previous dose of any influenza vaccine.”
Many practitioners say egg allergies are on the rise due to the vaccine’s involvement with egg.

The CDC recommends everyone over 6 years of age should get the flu vaccine/however, this is not what the inserts advise. Then they go on to say, “People who can’t get the flu shot,” are, “People with severe, life-threatening allergies to flu vaccine or any ingredient in the vaccine. This might include gelatin, antibiotics, or other ingredients.”

At the same time the Mayo Clinic discusses who should get the flu vaccine. “Chronic medical conditions can also increase your risk of influenza complications.” Examples include HIV/AIDS,” even though those with immunosuppressive conditions like HIV/AIDS are concerns.
Other findings are connecting vaccinations to infant deaths.

Human and Experimental Toxicology reported, “It appears as though some infant deaths attributed to SIDS may be vaccine related, perhaps associated with biochemical or synergistic toxicity due to over-vaccination. Some infants’ deaths categorized as ‘suffocation’ or due to ‘unknown and unspecified causes’ may also be cases of SIDS reclassified within the ICD. Some of these infant deaths may be vaccine related as well. This trend toward reclassifying ICD data is a great concern of the CDC.” (p. 42).

Researchers Fine and Chen reported that babies died at a rate nearly eight times greater than normal within 3 days after getting a DPT vaccination.

The researchers found, “Most published studies have reported a deficit of sudden infant death syndrome among vaccinees, which may reflect confounding in their study designs. An expression is derived to explore the extent of underestimation that may be introduced in such studies, under different sets of conditions. Confounding of this sort is a general problem for studies of adverse reactions to prophylactic interventions, as they may be withheld from some individuals precisely because they are already at high risk of the adverse event.”

Finding vaccine negatives is a remarkably difficult task. Finding restrictive information on vaccinations shockingly, doesn’t really exist as it is removed and hidden, even though this report analyzed the IMR (infant mortality rates of different nations comparing their economic factors, race, and inoculation schedule) and found, “Nations that require more vaccine doses tend to have higher infant mortality rates.”

Even this article on Everything You Ever Needed To Know About Medical Exemptions To Vaccinations appears to be marketing. 

Click here to see a summary of state vaccine requirements and exemptions. Some parents who have immune compromised children, the ones who should be exempt, are finding there is no exemption due to pressure from politicians, even though their children could be defined as at risk.  John’s Hopkins lists exemptions for vaccines only to show nothing with a “page under review” for an extended period. of time.

Dr. Theresa Deisher from the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute spoke at the Autism One Conference on Worldwide Autism Epidemic & Human Fetal Manufactured Contaminated Vaccines studies and discusses change-points in the increase of autism correlated with the ingredients within the vaccinations. She explains the increase of autism while at the same time stipulations for qualifying as autistic has become more strict, meaning less kids are getting labeled. She discusses a change in the environment causing a change in disease, calling these change points. “We’ve looked at a variety of other environmental stressors including pollution, high voltage wires, microwaves, cell phones, birth control – none of those are associated with the change points. However, there’s one environmental stressor associated with change-points, not only in the US but across the globe. That is a switch in the way in which we manufacture vaccines from using animal cell lines to using fetal cell lines for manufacturing.” (21:45)

Dr. Deisher says the main danger currently seen, “Is a process called insertional mutagenesis. Those DNA fragments can insert into the genome of the child, create subsequent mutations and cause problems. There are 30, 40, or more papers now looking at the genomes of children who have developed autism. These children have hundreds of de novo mutations, those are mutations their parents do not have.” (25.30)

Science has shown us the cause of hundreds of de novo mutations to be radiation exposure, chemical toxin exposure and foreign DNA exposure.

“The only one of those three that correspond with the change points worldwide are the fetal manufactured contaminants (25,45),” Deisher says.

Deisher points out the vaccinations that directly correlate with those change points are Miravax and MMR2 in 1979, a polio vaccination in 1988, a second dose of MMR2 and a chicken pox vaccination in 1996. These vaccinations all fall in line with direct change points in human adverse responses, all are correlated with the fetal manufactured vaccine.

“We’ve identified an environmental toxin that’s been introduced, that corresponds to all of the US change points,” (26:53) she says. All of them are switching from animal based manufacturing to human based manufacturing, from fetal growth vaccination ingredients. 

Anti-vaxers are commonly attacked as people who endanger society, attacked by those who are profiting from vaccines. Additionally, they use this agenda to have others attack anti-vaxers, including making conversations on the topic mainstream in television shows and movies. The pro-vax movement proclaims the science backs up vaccination. Interestingly enough, the sources reporting this are connected to the companies that manufacture the vaccines. However, recent outbreaks are connected to vaccinated children. Some people say live viruses are being released in public areas in order to create outbreaks which will further the vaccine market. 

People who received a vaccine for a disease are still catching the disease.

There are natural ways to strengthen the immune system to prevent disease. It is not normal to remain in a state of fear regarding acquiring an illness. If a person is immunocompromised it is advised to stay away from potentially dangerous environments while building up the system to strengthen the body naturally.

Research is currently being conducted on probiotic use to prevent disease including the flu. Enormous success is seen with intentional probiotic use with fermented food products like kraut juice, sauerkraut and other traditionally fermented foods. Others are conducting tests with less dominant beneficial strains such as this study.

*Nourishing Plot is written by Becky Plotner, ND, traditional naturopath, CGP, D.PSc. who sees clients in Rossville, Georgia. She is a Board Certified Naturopathic Doctor, through The American Naturopathic Medical Association and works as a Certified GAPS Practitioner who sees clients in her office, Skype and phone. She has been published in Wise Traditions, spoken at two Weston A. Price Conferences, Certified GAPS Practitioner Trainings, has been on many radio shows, television shows and writes for Nourishing Plot. Since her son was delivered from the effects of autism (Asperger’s syndrome), ADHD, bipolar disorder/manic depression, hypoglycemia and dyslexia, through food, she continued her education specializing in Leaky Gut and parasitology through Duke University, finishing with distinction. She is a Chapter Leader for The Weston A. Price Foundation. [email protected]

“GAPS™ and Gut and Psychology Syndrome™ are the trademark and copyright of Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride. The right of Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Patent and Designs Act 1988.




Tagged with:

Probiotic Foods vs Commercial Probiotics

GAPS, Stage by Stage, With Recipes

Joyous Song, The Proverbs 31 Woman

The Fontainebleu Miami

Ocean Drive Guidebook

%d bloggers like this: